Guardian touts op-ed on why AI takeover won’t happen as ‘written by robot,’ but tech-heads smell a person behind the secret

Guardian touts op-ed on why AI takeover won’t happen as ‘written by robot,’ but tech-heads smell a person behind the secret

“A robot published this article that is entire. Have you been frightened yet, human being?” reads the title regarding the opinion piece posted on Tuesday. This article ended up being caused by GPT-3, referred to as “a leading edge model that makes use of device understanding how to produce human-like text.”

Even though the Guardian claims that the algorithm that is soulless expected to “write an essay for people from scratch,” one has to see the editor’s note underneath the purportedly AI-penned opus to observe that the problem is more complex. It states that the equipment was given a prompt asking it to “focus on why people have actually absolutely nothing to fear from AI” and had tries that are several the job.

Following the robot came up with up to eight essays, that the Guardian claims were all “unique, interesting and advanced an alternative argument,” the really human editors cherry-picked “the best benefit of each” to create a coherent text away from them.

Even though Guardian said so it took its team that is op-ed even time and energy to modify GPT-3’s musings than articles published by humans, tech specialists and online pundits have actually cried foul, accusing the magazine of “overhyping” the matter and selling their particular thoughts under a clickbait name.

“Editor’s note: Actually, we published the standfirst while the rather misleading headline. Additionally, the robot penned eight times that much and then we organised it making it better…” tweeted Bloomberg Tax editor Joe Stanley-Smith. Continue reading